Mostly I don't think about it. But then enough of the evidence and criticism that's out there starts to stack up, and it becomes impossible not to see, even if just a momentary realization. This fall, two works of fiction and a number of on-going news events got to me.
(Mediated) Reality:
- Try following the Julian Assange extradition and rape charge case. Without falling into the whole Cult of Julian trap, I am convinced that Assange's Wikileaks project is on the side of right. Admittedly I haven't done any real research (only the Swedish documentary film, Wikirebels, and this long panel discussion with Slavoj Zizek), and I think I'm probably more of a supporter of the breakout group (led by Daniel Domscheit-Berg), which split from Wikileaks in protest of Assange's leadership, than I am of Wikileaks itself. Nonetheless, I get the sense that with Wikileaks Assange created a new model for regaining control over state-corporate interests, which were just on the bring of locking up total control of, well, everything. It's amazing to see how these state-corporate interests are managing Assange.
- Try following the related case against Bradley Manning. There's a good summary here.
- Or how about examining the ironic scenario in which President Barak Obama, a candidate I supported and voted for, commemorated the sixty-third anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but refused to veto the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), a piece of legislation that now makes it legal for the US government to incarcerate US citizens at any time, for any reason... If you (like me) thought Obama was more ethical than his predecessor, you (like me) were sadly mistaken.
- Oh, and in case you thought model social democratic states like Norway or Canada are innocent of this kind of thing, think again. Take a gander at this analysis of the Keystone Pipeline proposal that Canada is keen to implement.
Fiction:
- I read H.G. Wells' Nineteen Eighty-Four for the first time this fall. I could care less about the "critical tradition" that seeks to label the novel either prophecy or satire. That's totally missing the point, which instead is that Wells describes in exacting details the motivations and processes of perpetual global war; this is a playbook that the U.S. and its allies and corporations are following with chilling accuracy.
- Just last night KE and I watched Stephen Gahan's Syriana (2005). Like a lot of the critics, we were confused by the multiple story lines and not quite sure who all those people were, so it certainly wasn't an entertaining film. But by gum it sure hit home. I dreamed the movie, and woke up filled with the sense of hopelessness and utter corruption that it seeks to convey. The movie is an adaptation of Robert Baer's exposé, See No Evil: The True Story of a Ground Soldier in the CIA's War Against Terrorism (2003), a book I may have to read. The title of the movie is apparently taken from the diplomatic term "Pax Syriana"; there's an interesting online Q & A session about the film with the director here where he discusses the term, among many other things.
Here's a quote I really liked from the Gahan interview:
I found the war on drugs to be a war on an abstraction, a war on brain chemistry, a war on human nature. And I find the war on terror to be another war with an abstraction at the heart of its semantics. And I don't think that our democracy exportation project is working very well. If anybody had been with me in Damascus and the Syrian desert in '02 speaking to the Iraqis that I met, they wouldn't have been very optimistic about the democracy exportation project either. I think the war on terror has succeeded in creating more terror, more terrorists, a less safe America and a less safe world.
Gah! Where do we even start?! And that's not even touching on the rabid responses to the Occupy Movement, to the Arab Spring, and the 99%. It's crazy that all this is happening, and the cause-and-effect processes are as transparent as they are, yet our lives are still so utterly dominated by entitlement, entertainment, and completely irrelevant and counterfactual "issues."
ETA: I need to start a movie list. It starts with The Trials of Henry Kissinger (2000), coincidentally a merciless (and probably correct) critique put together by the late Christopher Hitchens. Kissinger appears to be the mastermind behind the last four decades of US foreign policy, and his legacy was carried on by the likes of Paul Wolfowitz...
ETA: I need to start a movie list. It starts with The Trials of Henry Kissinger (2000), coincidentally a merciless (and probably correct) critique put together by the late Christopher Hitchens. Kissinger appears to be the mastermind behind the last four decades of US foreign policy, and his legacy was carried on by the likes of Paul Wolfowitz...






